基于改进模糊层次分析法对高速列车轮轨等效锥度优化方案的评价研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

华东交通大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

高速列车轮轨型面匹配性能在线评估方法与机会维护策略研究


Study on the evaluation method of high speed train based on improved fuzzy hierarchy analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Research on in-service evaluation method of profile matching performance and opportunity maintenance strategy for wheel/rail of high-speed train

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【目的】针对当前缺乏高速列车轮轨等效锥度优化方案综合评价体系的问题,本研究旨在开发一种基于改进模糊层次分析法的评价方法,以确定最适宜的等效锥度方案,确保列车平稳运行。【方法】研究首先结合影响等效锥度选取的主要动力学因素,选取了14个评价指标构建指标分解模型,并应用改进的三标度层次分析法来确定各指标的权重。随后,在动力学软件Simpack中建立三种不同等效锥度的工况,计算出各底层指标值并进行无量纲化处理,确定模糊评价隶属度矩阵,并构建模糊理论系统评价模型,以得出三种方案的综合评价结果。【结果】综合评价结果表明,三种等效锥度方案的得分分别为:方案M1:26.2%,方案M2:17.9%,方案M3:16.2%,由此确定方案M1为最优选择。通过对两组具有显著差异的等效锥度方案进行动力学仿真计算,并观察后处理模块的直观仿真结果,发现结果与综合评价体系的结论相一致,验证了评价方法的可靠性。【结论】本研究所提出的基于改进模糊层次分析法的高速列车轮轨等效锥度评价方法是有效的,能够为高速列车的等效锥度方案优选提供科学依据,确保列车的稳定性和安全性。

    Abstract:

    【AIMS】 In view of the lack of comprehensive evaluation system for high-speed train wheel and rail optimization scheme, this study aims to develop an evaluation method based on improved fuzzy hierarchy analysis method to determine the most appropriate equivalent conicity scheme and ensure the smooth operation of the train.【Methods】Firstly, in the light of the main kinetic factors affecting the selection of equivalent conicity, 14 evaluation indexes were selected to construct the index decomposition model, and the improved three-scale hierarchy analysis method was applied to determine the weight of each index. Subsequently, three different working conditions with equivalent conicity were established in the dynamics software Simpack, and the underlying index values were calculated and dimensionless to determine the fuzzy evaluation membership matrix, and the fuzzy theory system evaluation model was constructed to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of the three schemes.【Results】The comprehensive evaluation results show that the scores of the three equivalent conicity schemes are: M1:26.2%, M2:17.9%, and M3:16.2%, from which M1 was determined as the optimal choice. By calculating the kinetic simulation of the two groups and observing the intuitive simulation results of the post-processing module, the results are consistent with the conclusion of the comprehensive evaluation system, and then the reliability of the evaluation method is verified.【Conclusion】The method of equivalent conicity evaluation of high-speed train wheel and rail based on improved fuzzy hierarchy analysis proposed in this study is effective, which can provide scientific basis for the optimization of equivalent conicity scheme of high-speed trains and ensure the stability and safety of trains.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-16
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-16
  • 录用日期:2024-05-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-14
  • 出版日期: