模拟轮载作用下钢桥面板RD节点疲劳寿命计算方法对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

田亮(1984—),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为高性能钢桥结构,疲劳与断裂。E-mail:sjtu_tl@126.com。

中图分类号:

U443.32

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51708346);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFB1200602-28,2016YFB1200601-B27);中国铁建股份有限公司科技重大专项(2020-A01);天津市企业科技特派员项目(22YDTPJC00210);天津市科技开发项目(19YDL,SF00030)


Comparative Analysis of Fatigue Life Calculation Methods for RibTo-Deck Joints in Steel Bridge Decks Under Simulated Wheel Load
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为深入研究 RD(rib-deck)节点的疲劳性能,通过模拟车轮荷载对 RD 节点实施中心加载,得到了相应热点应力幅下的节点疲劳寿命。采用 ABAQUS 建立了钢桥面板 RD 节点的三维实体有限元模型,在有效数值模型的基础上,分别采用热点应力法和临界距离理论对 RD 节点的疲劳寿命进行了对比分析。 研究结果表明:同一精度网格下采用两点外推法和三点外推法得到的热点应力结果比较接近,而采用临界距离理论的点法得到的特征应力则小于线法得到的特征应力;采用国际焊接协会(IIW) 推荐的 FAT 90 曲线得到的评估结果过于保守,而 FAT 125 曲线的预测结果相对接近试验值。临界距离理论相比热点应力法能得到更准确的预测结果,其中点法和线法得到的预测值与试验值分别相差 17%、32%;总体而言,热点应力法和临界距离理论均能得到相对保守的疲劳寿命预测结果,两种方法用于钢桥面板典型焊接节点的疲劳性能评估是可行且偏于安全的,但点法的预测精度更高,且实际应用中也较为便捷。

    Abstract:

    In order to further study the fatigue performance of RD joint, the RD joint was subjected to central loading by simulating wheel loads, and the fatigue life of RD joint under corresponding hot spot stress range was obtained by conducting fatigue tests. The 3D solid finite element model of RD joint in steel bridge decks was established by using ABAQUS. Based on the effective numerical model, the fatigue life of RD joint was compared and analyzed by using the hot spot stress method and the critical distance theory respectively. The results show that under the same finite element mesh, the hot spot stress results obtained by two -point extrapolation and three-point extrapolation are relatively close, while the characteristic stress obtained by point method using the critical distance theory is smaller than that obtained by line method. The evaluation results obtained by FAT90 S-N curve recommended by IIW are too conservative, while the prediction results of FAT125 S-N curve are relatively close to the measured value. Compared with the hot spot stress method, the critical distance theory can get more accurate prediction results, in which the prediction errors obtained by the point method and the line method are 17% and 32% respectively. In general, both the hot spot stress method and the critical distance theory can get relatively conservative fatigue life prediction results. Therefore, the two methods are feasible and safe for fatigue behavior evaluation of typical welded joints in steel bridge decks. However, the point method has higher prediction accuracy and is also more convenient in practical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田亮,邢守航,樊立龙,赵健,程斌,赵雪敏.模拟轮载作用下钢桥面板RD节点疲劳寿命计算方法对比分析[J].华东交通大学学报,2023,40(4):76-85.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-26
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-18
  • 出版日期: