CRTSⅢ型板和双块式无砟轨道振动噪声特性研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华东交通大学铁路环境振动与噪声教育部工程研究中心,江西 南昌 330013 ;2.华东交通大学轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013

作者简介:

通讯作者:

罗锟(1978—),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为轨道交通环境振动、噪声。E-mail:lk360111@163.com。

中图分类号:

U211.3;U448.21+3

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52178424,51868023);江西省自然科学重点基金项目(20224ACB204018);江西省科技专项(20223AEI91004);江西省教育厅课题(GJJ2205122);轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室自主课题(HJGZ2023207)


Investigation of Vibration and Noise Characteristics in CRTS Ⅲ Plate and Double-block Ballastless Track
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Engineering Research Center for Railway Environmental Vibration and Noise of the Ministry of Education, East China JiaotongUniversity, Nanchang 330013 , China ; 2.State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure,East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的】探究高速铁路CRTS Ⅲ型板和双块式无砟轨道的结构振动与噪声特性。【方法】以有限元、多体动力学与边界元相结合的方法为基础,通过建立高速列车-无砟轨道-箱梁耦合动力学模型和边界元模型,研究列车高速通过时的列车-轨道箱梁耦合系统的结构动力响应,以及噪声辐射特性。【结果】结果表明,列车通过桥上CRTS Ⅲ型板与双块式轨道结构段时,列车的最大轮重减载率分别为0.053 6与0.165 7,下部箱梁挠度分别为1/9 673与1/8 457。与双块式无砟轨道相比,CRTS Ⅲ型板的轨道板及底座位移响应更小,并且轨道-箱梁系统的竖向振动衰减更快,减振性能更优。另外,比较两种轨道结构条件下的高架箱梁结构噪声,CRTS Ⅲ型板段的箱梁噪声总声压级更小。但是,桥下远场点噪声峰值差异较小,峰值频率接近,均为 31.5 Hz左右;而桥下峰值频率差异较大,Ⅲ型板的峰值频率为63 Hz,双块式则为20 Hz。【结论】CRTS Ⅲ型板式无砟轨道更适合在高速铁路桥梁段使用。

    Abstract:

    Objective】In order to explore the structural vibration and noise characteristics of high-speed railway CRTS Ⅲ type plates and double block tracks.【Method】Based on the method of finite element, multi-body dynamics and boundary element, the dynamic model and boundary element model of high-speed train-ballastless track-box girder coupling system are established to study the structural dynamic response and noise radiation characteristics of the train-track-box girder coupling system.【Result】The results show that the maximum wheel load reduction rate of the train is 0.053 6 and 0.165 7, and the deflection of the lower box girder is 1/9 673 and 1/8 457, respectively, when the train passes the CRTS Ⅲ plate and the double-block track structure section on the bridge. Compared with the double-block ballastless track, the displacement response of the track plate and the base of the CRTS Ⅲ plate is smaller, and the vertical vibration attenuation of the track-box girder system is faster, and the vibration damping performance is better. In addition, the total sound pressure level of the box girder noise of CRTS Ⅲ segment is lower than that of the two types of track structure. However, the difference between the peak noise of the far field point under the bridge is small, and the peak frequency is similar, both of which are about 31.5 Hz. The peak frequency under the bridge has large differences, the peak frequency of type Ⅲ board being 63 Hz, and the double block type being 20 Hz.【Conclusion】CRTS Ⅲ plate type ballastless track is more suitable for use in high-speed railway bridge sections.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗锟,王凯新,甄慧杰,陈鹏. CRTSⅢ型板和双块式无砟轨道振动噪声特性研究[J].华东交通大学学报,2024,41(3):29-36.
Luo Kun, Wang Kaixin, Zhen Huijie, Chen Peng. Investigation of Vibration and Noise Characteristics in CRTS Ⅲ Plate and Double-block Ballastless Track[J]. JOURNAL OF EAST CHINA JIAOTONG UNIVERSTTY,2024,41(3):29-36

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-17
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-09
  • 出版日期: