多机场终端区航线网络抗毁性分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京航空航天大学民航学院,江苏 南京 211106 ;2.南京航空航天大学空中交通管理系统全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 211106 ;3.中国民用航空局第二研究所,四川 成都 610041

作者简介:

彭瑛(1978—),女,讲师,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为空中交通管理。E-mail:py423@sina.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

V355;[U8]

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFB2602401);南京航空航天大学研究生科研与实践创新计划资助项目(xcxjh20230709)


Resilience Analysis of Multi-Airport Terminal Area Route Networks
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing Jiangsu 211106 , China ;2.State Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Management System, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing Jiangsu 210006 , China ; 3.The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Sichuan Chengdu 610041 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章以广州终端区与珠海终端区为例,运用复杂网络方法,分别构建广州终端区航线网络模型与珠海终端区航线网络模型。通过节点度、度分布、介数中心性、聚集系数、网络直径和平均路径长度等指标对网络的拓扑结构进行详细分析。在此基础上,利用度中心性、介数中心性和KBKNR算法识别节点重要程度,并设计随机攻击和蓄意攻击两种情景,以网络效率和网络连通度作为表征指标评估航线网络的抗毁性。实验结果表明:在随机攻击下,珠海终端区航线网络相较于广州终端区航线网络表现出更强的抗毁性;在蓄意攻击下,广州终端区航线网络的抗毁性更强;此外,相较于介数排序攻击和KBKNR排序攻击,度排序攻击更容易导致网络崩溃,应优先将度中心性高的节点作为关键节点进行保护。

    Abstract:

    This study uses the Guangzhou terminal area and the Zhuhai terminal area as examples, applying complex network methods to construct route network models for each. The network topology is analyzed in detail using indicators such as node degree, degree distribution, betweenness centrality, clustering coefficient, network diameter, and average path length. Based on this analysis, node importance is identified using degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and the KBKNR algorithm. Additionally, scenarios of random attacks and deliberate destruction are designed, and network efficiency and connectivity are used as metrics to evaluate the resilience of the route networks.The experimental results show that under random attacks, the Zhuhai terminal air route network demonstrates greater resilience compared to the Guangzhou terminal air route network. Conversely, under intentional attacks, the Guangzhou terminal air route network exhibits stronger resilience. Moreover, degree centrality attacks are more likely to cause network collapse compared to betweenness centrality attacks and KBKNR attacks, indicating that nodes with high degree centrality should be prioritized for protection as critical nodes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭瑛,叶文婕,王婷婷,等. 多机场终端区航线网络抗毁性分析[J]. 华东交通大学学报,2025,42(3):67-76.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-01
  • 出版日期:
关闭