联合分布式宏应变与机器学习的铁路桥梁监测预警方法
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 华东交通大学土木建筑学院,江西 南昌 330013 ; 2. 华东交通大学山区土木工程安全与韧性全国重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013 ; 3. 中铁桥隧技术有限公司,江苏 南京 210061

作者简介:

通讯作者:

吴必涛(1986—),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为桥梁结构健康监测与加固。E-mail:wubitao@ecjtu.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

U446

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52368042);江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人培养计划(20225BCJ23025);江西省优秀青年基金项目(20242BAB22008)


Railway Bridge Monitoring and Early Warning Method Combining Distributed Macro-Strain and Machine Learning
Author:
Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013 , China ; 2. State Key Laboratory of Safety and Resilience of Civil Engineering in Mountain Area, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013 , China ; 3. China Railway Bridge and Tunnel Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210061 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探究随机列车荷载下联合分布式宏应变监测与机器学习的桥梁评估预警方法,实现铁路桥梁分布式快速评估。建立列车-轨道-桥梁耦合振动三维精细化有限元模型,应用荷载统计分析方法构建与实际列车运营相适应的随机车流模型,基于分布式监测原理,提出分布式宏应变影响线面积作为桥梁预警的指标设计预警区间评估预警方法;进一步,通过多种刚度退化工况仿真分析,构建随机列车荷载下分布式宏应变监测数据样本库,对比研究4种机器学习方法对桥梁损伤定量与定位的准确率。结果表明,4种机器学习都能够对桥梁结构的局部损伤进行定位和定量,平均识别准确率都达到了90.0%,其中KNN模型和SVM模型在桥梁损伤定量的测试中表现最好,识别准确率均为95.0%,SVM模型在桥梁结构损伤定位的测试中表现最好,识别准确率为98.3%。联合分布式宏应变监测与机器学习的桥梁评估方法具有可行性,SVM模型在桥梁结构损伤定位的测试中表现最好,KNN模型和SVM模型在桥梁损伤定量的测试中表现最好,综合分析,SVM在桥梁损伤定位与损伤定量分析表现最优。

    Abstract:

    In order to investigate the early warning method for bridge assessment under random train loading with joint distributed macro-strain monitoring and machine learning, and to realize the distributed rapid assessment of railroad bridges, this study establish a three-dimensional refined finite element model of vehicle-rail-bridge coupled vibration. It is also apply load statistical analysis methods to construct a stochastic traffic flow model that is suitable for actual train operation, and based on the principle of distributed monitoring, propose a distributed macro-strain influence line area as the indicator design warning interval evaluation warning method for bridge warning; Furthermore, through simulation analysis of various stiffness degradation conditions, a distributed macro-strain monitoring data sample library under random train loads was constructed to compare and study the accuracy of 4 machine learning methods in quantifying and locating bridge damage. The results show that all 4 types of machine learning are able to localize and quantify the localized damage of bridge structures with an average recognition accuracy of 90.0%, with the KNN model and the SVM model performing the best in the test of quantifying bridge damage, both with 95.0% recognition accuracy, and the SVM model performing the best in the test of locating the damage of the bridge structure, with a recognition accuracy of 98.3%. The joint distributed macro-strain monitoring and machine learning approach for bridge assessment has feasibility, SVM model performs best in the test of bridge structure damage localization, KNN model and SVM model perform best in the test of bridge damage quantification, and in the comprehensive analysis, SVM performs best in bridge damage localization and damage quantification analysis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴必涛,吴志鹏,樊小林,等. 联合分布式宏应变与机器学习的铁路桥梁监测预警方法[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2026,43(2):28-37.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-20
  • 出版日期:
关闭