基于改进模糊层次分析法的高速列车轮轨等效锥度优化方案评价研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

华东交通大学机车车辆智能运维铁路行业重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013

作者简介:

肖乾(1977—),男,二级教授,博士,江西省“井冈学者”特聘教授,研究方向为轨道交通车辆智能运维。E-mail:jxralph@foxmail.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U271.91

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52372327)


Research on Optimization Scheme Evaluation of Wheel-Rail Equivalent Conicity for High-Speed Trains Based on Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
Author:
Affiliation:

Railway Industry Key Laboratory of Intelligent Operation and Maintenance of Rolling Stock,East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的】针对当前缺乏高速列车轮轨等效锥度优化方案综合评价体系的问题,提出基于改进模糊层次分析法的综合评价方法。【方法】结合影响等效锥度选取的主要动力学因素,选取了14个评价指标构建指标分解模型,采用改进的三标度层次分析法确定权重。在动力学软件Simpack中建立3种等效锥度的模型,计算底层指标值并进行无量纲化处理,确定模糊评价隶属度矩阵,并构建模糊理论系统评价模型,得出3种方案的综合评价结果。【结果】3种等效锥度方案的得分分别为:方案M1为 26.2%,方案M2为17.9%,方案M3为16.2%,方案M1为最优选择。通过对两组具有显著差异的等效锥度方案进行动力学仿真计算,发现结果与综合评价体系的结论相一致,验证了评价方法的可靠性。【结论】可有效评价高速列车轮轨等效锥度方案, 能够为高速列车的等效锥度方案优选提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective】To address the lack of a comprehensive evaluation system for the optimization of equivalent conicity schemes for high-speed train wheel-rail interaction, a method based on an improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is proposed.【Method】Fourteen evaluation indicators were selected based on key dynamic factors influencing equivalent conicity and used to construct an indicator decomposition model. The improved three-scale fuzzy analytic hierarchy process was applied to determine the indicator weights. Three equivalent conicity models were established in the dynamic simulation software Simpack, with baseline indicator values computed and dimensionless normalization performed. A fuzzy evaluation membership matrix was constructed to develop a fuzzy theoretical evaluation system, and the comprehensive scores of the three schemes were obtained.【Result】The scores for the three equivalent conicity schemes are as follows: Scheme M1 scored 26.2%, outperforming Scheme M2 (17.9% ) and Scheme M3 (16.2% ), making M1 the optimal choice. Dynamic simulation comparisons between two significantly different schemes further validate the consistency of the evaluation system's conclusions with the simulation results, confirming the reliability of the proposed method.【Conclusion】 The proposed method effectively evaluates equivalent conicity schemes for high-speed trains and provides a scientific basis for optimizing scheme selection.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

肖乾,徐中旭.基于改进模糊层次分析法的高速列车轮轨等效锥度优化方案评价研究[J].华东交通大学学报,2024,41(6):90-98.
Xiao Qian, Xu Zhongxu. Research on Optimization Scheme Evaluation of Wheel-Rail Equivalent Conicity for High-Speed Trains Based on Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. JOURNAL OF EAST CHINA JIAOTONG UNIVERSTTY,2024,41(6):90-98

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-26
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-10
  • 出版日期: